REITwave
/
Screener Heatmap ACRE Profile FPI Profile

Ares Commercial Real Estate Corp (ACRE) vs Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI)

Ares Commercial Real Estate Corp

5.07% Yield
$3.35 • Safety: 80/100 • 14.0x P/AFFO
View ACRE Full Profile →
VS
ACRE LEADS
7 of 8 Categories

Farmland Partners Inc.

5.17% Yield
$10.25 • Safety: 80/100 • 14.0x P/AFFO
View FPI Full Profile →

Quantitative Head-to-Head Battleground Verdict

Quantitative Leader: ACRE

In this 2026 quantitative comparison between Ares Commercial Real Estate Corp (ACRE) and Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI), Ares Commercial Real Estate Corp (ACRE) wins across 7 of the 8 core financial battleground categories. ACRE offers a dividend yield of 5.07% with a safety score of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 70.8%, while FPI offers 5.17% yield with a safety score of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 72.6%. On a multiple basis, ACRE commands a more attractive valuation at 14.0x P/AFFO vs 14.0x.

REITwave Snowflake™ Radar Battle: ACRE vs FPI

ACRE: 79/100 FPI: 79/100

Proprietary 5-pillar institutional overlay comparing Dividend Safety, Balance Sheet, Portfolio Quality, Cash Flow, and Valuation.

DIVIDEND ACRE: 18.0 vs FPI: 18.0 BALANCE SHEET ACRE: 13.5 vs FPI: 13.5 PORTFOLIO ACRE: 15.0 vs FPI: 15.0 CASH FLOW ACRE: 15.5 vs FPI: 15.5 VALUE & NAV ACRE: 17.0 vs FPI: 17.0
ACRE Technical Chart (Ares Commercial Real Estate Corp) $3.35
FPI Technical Chart (Farmland Partners Inc.) $10.25

12-Metric Institutional Side-by-Side Matrix

Core financial, valuation, dividend safety, balance sheet, and physical asset metrics.

Institutional Metric ACRE (Ares Commercial Real Estate Corp) FPI (Farmland Partners Inc.) Category Advantage
REITwave Composite Score™ 79 / 100 (CORE ELITE) Higher Quality 79 / 100 (CORE ELITE) ACRE (+0 pts)
Dividend Yield 5.07% 5.17% Higher Yield FPI (+0.10% Spread)
Dividend Safety Score 80 / 100 Safer 80 / 100 ACRE
AFFO Payout Ratio 70.8% Safer Cushion 72.6% ACRE (1.8% Lower)
Price / AFFO Multiple 14.0x Cheaper 14.0x ACRE
Price / FFO Multiple 12.9x Cheaper 13.0x ACRE
NAV Premium / Discount -8.2% Better Value -8.2% ACRE
Net Debt-to-EBITDA (Leverage) 5.4x Lower Debt 5.4x ACRE (Clean Balance Sheet)
Credit Rating (S&P / Moody's) BBB BBB Investment Grade
Physical Occupancy 95.0% Higher 95.0% ACRE
Commercial Real Estate Assets 150 Properties 150 Properties FPI (Larger Portfolio Scale)
Implied Market Cap Rate 6.54% 6.54% Spread vs 10-Yr Treasury
Payout Cadence & 52-Week Range Quarterly ($3.16 - $5.89) Quarterly ($9.21 - $13.22) Quarterly Distribution
Chapter 1

The Dividend Engine, Payout Safety & Cash Coverage

When analyzing dividend-generating Real Estate Investment Trusts, yield alone can be misleading without evaluating the underlying AFFO Payout Coverage Ratio and long-term cash flow durability. In this matchup, FPI leads with an annualized cash yield of 5.17%, delivering a +0.10% yield premium over ACRE's 5.07%.

However, dividend safety and dividend durability heavily favor the REIT with the stronger cash retention cushion. ACRE distributes 70.8% of its Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO), compared to 72.6% for FPI. A payout ratio below 80% provides vital protection against localized occupancy declines, enabling management to preserve distributions and self-fund redevelopment without accessing volatile capital markets.

Both companies operate on a quarterly distribution schedule, creating steady passive income streams for retirement accounts and income-oriented portfolios seeking Sleep-Well-At-Night (SWAN) stability.

Chapter 2

Valuation Multiples, P/AFFO Compression & NAV Arbitrage

Real estate equity valuations are best captured through the P/AFFO (Price-to-AFFO) multiple and the implied discount to private-market Net Asset Value (NAV). ACRE commands a more attractive multiple at 14.0x P/AFFO, trading at a measurable discount to FPI's 14.0x multiple.

Examining intrinsic property values, ACRE trades at a -8.2% spread to NAV, while FPI trades at -8.2% to NAV. When public REITs trade at a discount to Net Asset Value, investors effectively acquire institutional-grade commercial real estate assets at a price below replacement cost, providing built-in margin of safety and upside potential during sector valuation re-ratings.

Furthermore, the implied market cap rate sits at 6.54% for ACRE and 6.54% for FPI, offering healthy yield spreads over the benchmark 10-Year US Treasury yield.

Chapter 3

Balance Sheet Fortress, Leverage & Refinancing Wall Resilience

In a normalized higher-for-longer interest rate regime, balance sheet capitalization separates resilient REITs from vulnerable ones. ACRE holds the cleaner balance sheet with a Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 5.4x, substantially below commercial real estate danger thresholds, compared to 5.4x for FPI.

Credit rating agencies award ACRE an investment-grade rating of BBB, while FPI maintains a BBB credit rating. Superior credit tiers ensure lower credit spreads when issuing unsecured senior notes, insulating profitability against high-yield refinancing walls and borrowing cost spikes.

Combined with an occupancy rate of 95.0% for ACRE and 95.0% for FPI across a combined 300 commercial properties, tenant demand remains structurally resilient against economic headwinds.

Chapter 4

The 2026 Investor Verdict — Which REIT Belongs in Your Portfolio?

Determining whether to buy ACRE or FPI depends on your investment mandate and risk profile:

  • For Retirees & Current Yield Maximizers: FPI is the winner. Offering a 5.17% dividend yield, it optimizes immediate cash flow generation to support living expenses and distribution reinvestment.
  • For Conservative Wealth Preservation (SWAN) Investors: ACRE represents the premier holding. Its higher safety rating of 80/100, lower leverage ratio of 5.4x Net Debt/EBITDA, and disciplined AFFO payout provide robust capital protection.
  • Tax Optimization (Section 199A): Both ACRE and FPI dividends are eligible for the 20% Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction under Section 199A for US taxable accounts, significantly reducing the effective federal tax rate on income distributions.

Frequently Asked Questions: ACRE vs FPI

Key commercial real estate questions answered for institutional and retail investors.

Which REIT offers a higher dividend yield in 2026, ACRE or FPI? +
FPI delivers the higher current dividend yield of 5.17% compared to 5.07% for ACRE, representing an annualized cash yield spread of 0.10%.
Is ACRE or FPI safer based on balance sheet leverage and AFFO dividend coverage? +
Both REITs maintain safe balance sheets, but ACRE carries a superior dividend safety rating of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 70.8%, backed by Net Debt-to-EBITDA leverage of 5.4x.
Which REIT is trading at a more attractive valuation multiple (P/AFFO and NAV)? +
ACRE trades at a lower valuation multiple of 14.0x P/AFFO (vs 14.0x). On a private-market appraisal basis, ACRE trades at a 8.2% discount to Net Asset Value (NAV).
How do interest rate fluctuations and Federal Reserve policy impact ACRE versus FPI? +
Higher interest rates elevate borrowing costs and increase cap rates across commercial real estate. ACRE holds an advantage with lower Net Debt-to-EBITDA of 5.4x, reducing debt refinancing risk on debt maturity walls.
What is the dividend payout schedule (monthly or quarterly) for ACRE and FPI? +
ACRE pays distributions on a quarterly schedule, while FPI distributes dividends on a quarterly schedule. Reinvesting compounding distributions enhances long-term total return.
Are distributions from ACRE and FPI eligible for the Section 199A 20% QBI tax deduction? +
Yes. Under US tax law, ordinary REIT dividends generally qualify for the Section 199A deduction, enabling eligible US taxable investors to deduct up to 20% of qualified REIT dividends from their taxable income.

Related Diversified REIT Head-to-Head Battles

Explore quantitative comparisons across sector peers and benchmark REIT matchups.