REITwave
/
Screener Heatmap ALX Profile FREVS Profile

ALEXANDERS INC (ALX) vs FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY, INC. (FREVS)

ALEXANDERS INC

5.14% Yield
$248.39 • Safety: 80/100 • 14.0x P/AFFO
View ALX Full Profile →
VS
ALX LEADS
7 of 8 Categories

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY, INC.

5.15% Yield
$18.65 • Safety: 80/100 • 14.0x P/AFFO
View FREVS Full Profile →

Quantitative Head-to-Head Battleground Verdict

Quantitative Leader: ALX

In this 2026 quantitative comparison between ALEXANDERS INC (ALX) and FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY, INC. (FREVS), ALEXANDERS INC (ALX) wins across 7 of the 8 core financial battleground categories. ALX offers a dividend yield of 5.14% with a safety score of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 72.0%, while FREVS offers 5.15% yield with a safety score of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 72.2%. On a multiple basis, ALX commands a more attractive valuation at 14.0x P/AFFO vs 14.0x.

REITwave Snowflake™ Radar Battle: ALX vs FREVS

ALX: 79/100 FREVS: 79/100

Proprietary 5-pillar institutional overlay comparing Dividend Safety, Balance Sheet, Portfolio Quality, Cash Flow, and Valuation.

DIVIDEND ALX: 18.0 vs FREVS: 18.0 BALANCE SHEET ALX: 13.5 vs FREVS: 13.5 PORTFOLIO ALX: 15.0 vs FREVS: 15.0 CASH FLOW ALX: 15.5 vs FREVS: 15.5 VALUE & NAV ALX: 17.0 vs FREVS: 17.0
ALX Technical Chart (ALEXANDERS INC) $248.39
FREVS Technical Chart (FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY, INC.) $18.65

12-Metric Institutional Side-by-Side Matrix

Core financial, valuation, dividend safety, balance sheet, and physical asset metrics.

Institutional Metric ALX (ALEXANDERS INC) FREVS (FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY, INC.) Category Advantage
REITwave Composite Score™ 79 / 100 (CORE ELITE) Higher Quality 79 / 100 (CORE ELITE) ALX (+0 pts)
Dividend Yield 5.14% 5.15% Higher Yield FREVS (+0.01% Spread)
Dividend Safety Score 80 / 100 Safer 80 / 100 ALX
AFFO Payout Ratio 72.0% Safer Cushion 72.2% ALX (0.2% Lower)
Price / AFFO Multiple 14.0x Cheaper 14.0x ALX
Price / FFO Multiple 13.0x Cheaper 13.0x ALX
NAV Premium / Discount -8.3% Better Value -8.3% ALX
Net Debt-to-EBITDA (Leverage) 5.4x Lower Debt 5.4x ALX (Clean Balance Sheet)
Credit Rating (S&P / Moody's) BBB BBB Investment Grade
Physical Occupancy 95.0% Higher 95.0% ALX
Commercial Real Estate Assets 150 Properties 150 Properties FREVS (Larger Portfolio Scale)
Implied Market Cap Rate 6.54% 6.54% Spread vs 10-Yr Treasury
Payout Cadence & 52-Week Range Quarterly ($201.28 - $289.43) Quarterly ($11.01 - $23.00) Quarterly Distribution
Chapter 1

The Dividend Engine, Payout Safety & Cash Coverage

When analyzing dividend-generating Real Estate Investment Trusts, yield alone can be misleading without evaluating the underlying AFFO Payout Coverage Ratio and long-term cash flow durability. In this matchup, FREVS leads with an annualized cash yield of 5.15%, delivering a +0.01% yield premium over ALX's 5.14%.

However, dividend safety and dividend durability heavily favor the REIT with the stronger cash retention cushion. ALX distributes 72.0% of its Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO), compared to 72.2% for FREVS. A payout ratio below 80% provides vital protection against localized occupancy declines, enabling management to preserve distributions and self-fund redevelopment without accessing volatile capital markets.

Both companies operate on a quarterly distribution schedule, creating steady passive income streams for retirement accounts and income-oriented portfolios seeking Sleep-Well-At-Night (SWAN) stability.

Chapter 2

Valuation Multiples, P/AFFO Compression & NAV Arbitrage

Real estate equity valuations are best captured through the P/AFFO (Price-to-AFFO) multiple and the implied discount to private-market Net Asset Value (NAV). ALX commands a more attractive multiple at 14.0x P/AFFO, trading at a measurable discount to FREVS's 14.0x multiple.

Examining intrinsic property values, ALX trades at a -8.3% spread to NAV, while FREVS trades at -8.3% to NAV. When public REITs trade at a discount to Net Asset Value, investors effectively acquire institutional-grade commercial real estate assets at a price below replacement cost, providing built-in margin of safety and upside potential during sector valuation re-ratings.

Furthermore, the implied market cap rate sits at 6.54% for ALX and 6.54% for FREVS, offering healthy yield spreads over the benchmark 10-Year US Treasury yield.

Chapter 3

Balance Sheet Fortress, Leverage & Refinancing Wall Resilience

In a normalized higher-for-longer interest rate regime, balance sheet capitalization separates resilient REITs from vulnerable ones. ALX holds the cleaner balance sheet with a Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 5.4x, substantially below commercial real estate danger thresholds, compared to 5.4x for FREVS.

Credit rating agencies award ALX an investment-grade rating of BBB, while FREVS maintains a BBB credit rating. Superior credit tiers ensure lower credit spreads when issuing unsecured senior notes, insulating profitability against high-yield refinancing walls and borrowing cost spikes.

Combined with an occupancy rate of 95.0% for ALX and 95.0% for FREVS across a combined 300 commercial properties, tenant demand remains structurally resilient against economic headwinds.

Chapter 4

The 2026 Investor Verdict — Which REIT Belongs in Your Portfolio?

Determining whether to buy ALX or FREVS depends on your investment mandate and risk profile:

  • For Retirees & Current Yield Maximizers: FREVS is the winner. Offering a 5.15% dividend yield, it optimizes immediate cash flow generation to support living expenses and distribution reinvestment.
  • For Conservative Wealth Preservation (SWAN) Investors: ALX represents the premier holding. Its higher safety rating of 80/100, lower leverage ratio of 5.4x Net Debt/EBITDA, and disciplined AFFO payout provide robust capital protection.
  • Tax Optimization (Section 199A): Both ALX and FREVS dividends are eligible for the 20% Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction under Section 199A for US taxable accounts, significantly reducing the effective federal tax rate on income distributions.

Frequently Asked Questions: ALX vs FREVS

Key commercial real estate questions answered for institutional and retail investors.

Which REIT offers a higher dividend yield in 2026, ALX or FREVS? +
FREVS delivers the higher current dividend yield of 5.15% compared to 5.14% for ALX, representing an annualized cash yield spread of 0.01%.
Is ALX or FREVS safer based on balance sheet leverage and AFFO dividend coverage? +
Both REITs maintain safe balance sheets, but ALX carries a superior dividend safety rating of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 72.0%, backed by Net Debt-to-EBITDA leverage of 5.4x.
Which REIT is trading at a more attractive valuation multiple (P/AFFO and NAV)? +
ALX trades at a lower valuation multiple of 14.0x P/AFFO (vs 14.0x). On a private-market appraisal basis, ALX trades at a 8.3% discount to Net Asset Value (NAV).
How do interest rate fluctuations and Federal Reserve policy impact ALX versus FREVS? +
Higher interest rates elevate borrowing costs and increase cap rates across commercial real estate. ALX holds an advantage with lower Net Debt-to-EBITDA of 5.4x, reducing debt refinancing risk on debt maturity walls.
What is the dividend payout schedule (monthly or quarterly) for ALX and FREVS? +
ALX pays distributions on a quarterly schedule, while FREVS distributes dividends on a quarterly schedule. Reinvesting compounding distributions enhances long-term total return.
Are distributions from ALX and FREVS eligible for the Section 199A 20% QBI tax deduction? +
Yes. Under US tax law, ordinary REIT dividends generally qualify for the Section 199A deduction, enabling eligible US taxable investors to deduct up to 20% of qualified REIT dividends from their taxable income.

Related Diversified REIT Head-to-Head Battles

Explore quantitative comparisons across sector peers and benchmark REIT matchups.