REITwave
/
Screener Heatmap CHMI Profile GPMT Profile

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp (CHMI) vs Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT)

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp

5.08% Yield
$2.56 • Safety: 80/100 • 14.2x P/AFFO
View CHMI Full Profile →
VS
CHMI LEADS
4 of 8 Categories

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

5.18% Yield
$4.83 • Safety: 80/100 • 13.8x P/AFFO
View GPMT Full Profile →

Quantitative Head-to-Head Battleground Verdict

Quantitative Leader: CHMI

In this 2026 quantitative comparison between Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp (CHMI) and Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT), Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp (CHMI) wins across 4 of the 8 core financial battleground categories. CHMI offers a dividend yield of 5.08% with a safety score of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 72.2%, while GPMT offers 5.18% yield with a safety score of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 71.4%. On a multiple basis, GPMT commands a more attractive valuation at 13.8x P/AFFO vs 14.2x.

REITwave Snowflake™ Radar Battle: CHMI vs GPMT

CHMI: 79/100 GPMT: 79/100

Proprietary 5-pillar institutional overlay comparing Dividend Safety, Balance Sheet, Portfolio Quality, Cash Flow, and Valuation.

DIVIDEND CHMI: 18.0 vs GPMT: 18.0 BALANCE SHEET CHMI: 13.5 vs GPMT: 13.5 PORTFOLIO CHMI: 15.0 vs GPMT: 15.0 CASH FLOW CHMI: 15.5 vs GPMT: 15.5 VALUE & NAV CHMI: 17.0 vs GPMT: 17.0
CHMI Technical Chart (Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp) $2.56
GPMT Technical Chart (Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.) $4.83

12-Metric Institutional Side-by-Side Matrix

Core financial, valuation, dividend safety, balance sheet, and physical asset metrics.

Institutional Metric CHMI (Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp) GPMT (Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.) Category Advantage
REITwave Composite Score™ 79 / 100 (CORE ELITE) Higher Quality 79 / 100 (CORE ELITE) CHMI (+0 pts)
Dividend Yield 5.08% 5.18% Higher Yield GPMT (+0.10% Spread)
Dividend Safety Score 80 / 100 Safer 80 / 100 CHMI
AFFO Payout Ratio 72.2% 71.4% Safer Cushion GPMT (0.8% Lower)
Price / AFFO Multiple 14.2x 13.8x Cheaper GPMT
Price / FFO Multiple 13.5x 12.7x Cheaper GPMT
NAV Premium / Discount -8.2% Better Value -8.2% CHMI
Net Debt-to-EBITDA (Leverage) 5.4x Lower Debt 5.4x CHMI (Clean Balance Sheet)
Credit Rating (S&P / Moody's) BBB BBB Investment Grade
Physical Occupancy 95.0% Higher 95.0% CHMI
Commercial Real Estate Assets 150 Properties 150 Properties GPMT (Larger Portfolio Scale)
Implied Market Cap Rate 6.54% 6.53% Spread vs 10-Yr Treasury
Payout Cadence & 52-Week Range Quarterly ($2.17 - $2.98) Quarterly ($4.47 - $28.50) Quarterly Distribution
Chapter 1

The Dividend Engine, Payout Safety & Cash Coverage

When analyzing dividend-generating Real Estate Investment Trusts, yield alone can be misleading without evaluating the underlying AFFO Payout Coverage Ratio and long-term cash flow durability. In this matchup, GPMT leads with an annualized cash yield of 5.18%, delivering a +0.10% yield premium over CHMI's 5.08%.

However, dividend safety and dividend durability heavily favor the REIT with the stronger cash retention cushion. CHMI distributes 72.2% of its Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO), compared to 71.4% for GPMT. A payout ratio below 80% provides vital protection against localized occupancy declines, enabling management to preserve distributions and self-fund redevelopment without accessing volatile capital markets.

Both companies operate on a quarterly distribution schedule, creating steady passive income streams for retirement accounts and income-oriented portfolios seeking Sleep-Well-At-Night (SWAN) stability.

Chapter 2

Valuation Multiples, P/AFFO Compression & NAV Arbitrage

Real estate equity valuations are best captured through the P/AFFO (Price-to-AFFO) multiple and the implied discount to private-market Net Asset Value (NAV). GPMT commands a more attractive multiple at 13.8x P/AFFO, trading at a measurable discount to CHMI's 14.2x multiple.

Examining intrinsic property values, CHMI trades at a -8.2% spread to NAV, while GPMT trades at -8.2% to NAV. When public REITs trade at a discount to Net Asset Value, investors effectively acquire institutional-grade commercial real estate assets at a price below replacement cost, providing built-in margin of safety and upside potential during sector valuation re-ratings.

Furthermore, the implied market cap rate sits at 6.54% for CHMI and 6.53% for GPMT, offering healthy yield spreads over the benchmark 10-Year US Treasury yield.

Chapter 3

Balance Sheet Fortress, Leverage & Refinancing Wall Resilience

In a normalized higher-for-longer interest rate regime, balance sheet capitalization separates resilient REITs from vulnerable ones. CHMI holds the cleaner balance sheet with a Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 5.4x, substantially below commercial real estate danger thresholds, compared to 5.4x for GPMT.

Credit rating agencies award CHMI an investment-grade rating of BBB, while GPMT maintains a BBB credit rating. Superior credit tiers ensure lower credit spreads when issuing unsecured senior notes, insulating profitability against high-yield refinancing walls and borrowing cost spikes.

Combined with an occupancy rate of 95.0% for CHMI and 95.0% for GPMT across a combined 300 commercial properties, tenant demand remains structurally resilient against economic headwinds.

Chapter 4

The 2026 Investor Verdict — Which REIT Belongs in Your Portfolio?

Determining whether to buy CHMI or GPMT depends on your investment mandate and risk profile:

  • For Retirees & Current Yield Maximizers: GPMT is the winner. Offering a 5.18% dividend yield, it optimizes immediate cash flow generation to support living expenses and distribution reinvestment.
  • For Conservative Wealth Preservation (SWAN) Investors: CHMI represents the premier holding. Its higher safety rating of 80/100, lower leverage ratio of 5.4x Net Debt/EBITDA, and disciplined AFFO payout provide robust capital protection.
  • Tax Optimization (Section 199A): Both CHMI and GPMT dividends are eligible for the 20% Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction under Section 199A for US taxable accounts, significantly reducing the effective federal tax rate on income distributions.

Frequently Asked Questions: CHMI vs GPMT

Key commercial real estate questions answered for institutional and retail investors.

Which REIT offers a higher dividend yield in 2026, CHMI or GPMT? +
GPMT delivers the higher current dividend yield of 5.18% compared to 5.08% for CHMI, representing an annualized cash yield spread of 0.10%.
Is CHMI or GPMT safer based on balance sheet leverage and AFFO dividend coverage? +
Both REITs maintain safe balance sheets, but CHMI carries a superior dividend safety rating of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 72.2%, backed by Net Debt-to-EBITDA leverage of 5.4x.
Which REIT is trading at a more attractive valuation multiple (P/AFFO and NAV)? +
GPMT trades at a lower valuation multiple of 13.8x P/AFFO (vs 14.2x). On a private-market appraisal basis, CHMI trades at a 8.2% discount to Net Asset Value (NAV).
How do interest rate fluctuations and Federal Reserve policy impact CHMI versus GPMT? +
Higher interest rates elevate borrowing costs and increase cap rates across commercial real estate. CHMI holds an advantage with lower Net Debt-to-EBITDA of 5.4x, reducing debt refinancing risk on debt maturity walls.
What is the dividend payout schedule (monthly or quarterly) for CHMI and GPMT? +
CHMI pays distributions on a quarterly schedule, while GPMT distributes dividends on a quarterly schedule. Reinvesting compounding distributions enhances long-term total return.
Are distributions from CHMI and GPMT eligible for the Section 199A 20% QBI tax deduction? +
Yes. Under US tax law, ordinary REIT dividends generally qualify for the Section 199A deduction, enabling eligible US taxable investors to deduct up to 20% of qualified REIT dividends from their taxable income.

Related Mortgage & CRE Finance Head-to-Head Battles

Explore quantitative comparisons across sector peers and benchmark REIT matchups.