REITwave
/
Screener Heatmap CTO Profile OLP Profile

CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) vs ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES INC (OLP)

CTO Realty Growth, Inc.

5.16% Yield
$19.78 • Safety: 80/100 • 14.0x P/AFFO
View CTO Full Profile →
VS
CTO LEADS
6 of 8 Categories

ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES INC

5.15% Yield
$22.35 • Safety: 80/100 • 14.0x P/AFFO
View OLP Full Profile →

Quantitative Head-to-Head Battleground Verdict

Quantitative Leader: CTO

In this 2026 quantitative comparison between CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES INC (OLP), CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) wins across 6 of the 8 core financial battleground categories. CTO offers a dividend yield of 5.16% with a safety score of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 72.3%, while OLP offers 5.15% yield with a safety score of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 71.9%. On a multiple basis, CTO commands a more attractive valuation at 14.0x P/AFFO vs 14.0x.

REITwave Snowflake™ Radar Battle: CTO vs OLP

CTO: 79/100 OLP: 79/100

Proprietary 5-pillar institutional overlay comparing Dividend Safety, Balance Sheet, Portfolio Quality, Cash Flow, and Valuation.

DIVIDEND CTO: 18.0 vs OLP: 18.0 BALANCE SHEET CTO: 13.5 vs OLP: 13.5 PORTFOLIO CTO: 15.0 vs OLP: 15.0 CASH FLOW CTO: 15.5 vs OLP: 15.5 VALUE & NAV CTO: 17.0 vs OLP: 17.0
CTO Technical Chart (CTO Realty Growth, Inc.) $19.78
OLP Technical Chart (ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES INC) $22.35

12-Metric Institutional Side-by-Side Matrix

Core financial, valuation, dividend safety, balance sheet, and physical asset metrics.

Institutional Metric CTO (CTO Realty Growth, Inc.) OLP (ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES INC) Category Advantage
REITwave Composite Score™ 79 / 100 (CORE ELITE) Higher Quality 79 / 100 (CORE ELITE) CTO (+0 pts)
Dividend Yield 5.16% Higher Yield 5.15% CTO (+0.01% Spread)
Dividend Safety Score 80 / 100 Safer 80 / 100 CTO
AFFO Payout Ratio 72.3% 71.9% Safer Cushion OLP (0.4% Lower)
Price / AFFO Multiple 14.0x Cheaper 14.0x CTO
Price / FFO Multiple 13.0x 12.9x Cheaper OLP
NAV Premium / Discount -8.3% Better Value -8.3% CTO
Net Debt-to-EBITDA (Leverage) 5.4x Lower Debt 5.4x CTO (Clean Balance Sheet)
Credit Rating (S&P / Moody's) BBB BBB Investment Grade
Physical Occupancy 95.0% Higher 95.0% CTO
Commercial Real Estate Assets 150 Properties 150 Properties OLP (Larger Portfolio Scale)
Implied Market Cap Rate 6.54% 6.54% Spread vs 10-Yr Treasury
Payout Cadence & 52-Week Range Quarterly ($16.02 - $22.71) Quarterly ($19.62 - $25.88) Quarterly Distribution
Chapter 1

The Dividend Engine, Payout Safety & Cash Coverage

When analyzing dividend-generating Real Estate Investment Trusts, yield alone can be misleading without evaluating the underlying AFFO Payout Coverage Ratio and long-term cash flow durability. In this matchup, CTO leads with an annualized cash yield of 5.16%, delivering a +0.01% yield premium over OLP's 5.15%.

However, dividend safety and dividend durability heavily favor the REIT with the stronger cash retention cushion. CTO distributes 72.3% of its Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO), compared to 71.9% for OLP. A payout ratio below 80% provides vital protection against localized occupancy declines, enabling management to preserve distributions and self-fund redevelopment without accessing volatile capital markets.

Both companies operate on a quarterly distribution schedule, creating steady passive income streams for retirement accounts and income-oriented portfolios seeking Sleep-Well-At-Night (SWAN) stability.

Chapter 2

Valuation Multiples, P/AFFO Compression & NAV Arbitrage

Real estate equity valuations are best captured through the P/AFFO (Price-to-AFFO) multiple and the implied discount to private-market Net Asset Value (NAV). CTO commands a more attractive multiple at 14.0x P/AFFO, trading at a measurable discount to OLP's 14.0x multiple.

Examining intrinsic property values, CTO trades at a -8.3% spread to NAV, while OLP trades at -8.3% to NAV. When public REITs trade at a discount to Net Asset Value, investors effectively acquire institutional-grade commercial real estate assets at a price below replacement cost, providing built-in margin of safety and upside potential during sector valuation re-ratings.

Furthermore, the implied market cap rate sits at 6.54% for CTO and 6.54% for OLP, offering healthy yield spreads over the benchmark 10-Year US Treasury yield.

Chapter 3

Balance Sheet Fortress, Leverage & Refinancing Wall Resilience

In a normalized higher-for-longer interest rate regime, balance sheet capitalization separates resilient REITs from vulnerable ones. CTO holds the cleaner balance sheet with a Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 5.4x, substantially below commercial real estate danger thresholds, compared to 5.4x for OLP.

Credit rating agencies award CTO an investment-grade rating of BBB, while OLP maintains a BBB credit rating. Superior credit tiers ensure lower credit spreads when issuing unsecured senior notes, insulating profitability against high-yield refinancing walls and borrowing cost spikes.

Combined with an occupancy rate of 95.0% for CTO and 95.0% for OLP across a combined 300 commercial properties, tenant demand remains structurally resilient against economic headwinds.

Chapter 4

The 2026 Investor Verdict — Which REIT Belongs in Your Portfolio?

Determining whether to buy CTO or OLP depends on your investment mandate and risk profile:

  • For Retirees & Current Yield Maximizers: CTO is the winner. Offering a 5.16% dividend yield, it optimizes immediate cash flow generation to support living expenses and distribution reinvestment.
  • For Conservative Wealth Preservation (SWAN) Investors: CTO represents the premier holding. Its higher safety rating of 80/100, lower leverage ratio of 5.4x Net Debt/EBITDA, and disciplined AFFO payout provide robust capital protection.
  • Tax Optimization (Section 199A): Both CTO and OLP dividends are eligible for the 20% Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction under Section 199A for US taxable accounts, significantly reducing the effective federal tax rate on income distributions.

Frequently Asked Questions: CTO vs OLP

Key commercial real estate questions answered for institutional and retail investors.

Which REIT offers a higher dividend yield in 2026, CTO or OLP? +
CTO delivers the higher current dividend yield of 5.16% compared to 5.15% for OLP, representing an annualized cash yield spread of 0.01%.
Is CTO or OLP safer based on balance sheet leverage and AFFO dividend coverage? +
Both REITs maintain safe balance sheets, but CTO carries a superior dividend safety rating of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 72.3%, backed by Net Debt-to-EBITDA leverage of 5.4x.
Which REIT is trading at a more attractive valuation multiple (P/AFFO and NAV)? +
CTO trades at a lower valuation multiple of 14.0x P/AFFO (vs 14.0x). On a private-market appraisal basis, CTO trades at a 8.3% discount to Net Asset Value (NAV).
How do interest rate fluctuations and Federal Reserve policy impact CTO versus OLP? +
Higher interest rates elevate borrowing costs and increase cap rates across commercial real estate. CTO holds an advantage with lower Net Debt-to-EBITDA of 5.4x, reducing debt refinancing risk on debt maturity walls.
What is the dividend payout schedule (monthly or quarterly) for CTO and OLP? +
CTO pays distributions on a quarterly schedule, while OLP distributes dividends on a quarterly schedule. Reinvesting compounding distributions enhances long-term total return.
Are distributions from CTO and OLP eligible for the Section 199A 20% QBI tax deduction? +
Yes. Under US tax law, ordinary REIT dividends generally qualify for the Section 199A deduction, enabling eligible US taxable investors to deduct up to 20% of qualified REIT dividends from their taxable income.

Related Commercial / Retail Head-to-Head Battles

Explore quantitative comparisons across sector peers and benchmark REIT matchups.