REITwave
/
Screener Heatmap FCPT Profile WPC Profile

Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) vs W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC)

Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

6.00% Yield
$22.15 • Safety: 88/100 • 12.5x P/AFFO
View FCPT Full Profile →
VS
FCPT LEADS
4 of 8 Categories

W. P. Carey Inc.

6.34% Yield
$63.90 • Safety: 84/100 • 12.0x P/AFFO
View WPC Full Profile →

Quantitative Head-to-Head Battleground Verdict

Quantitative Leader: FCPT

In this 2026 quantitative comparison between Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC), Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) wins across 4 of the 8 core financial battleground categories. FCPT offers a dividend yield of 6.00% with a safety score of 88/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 75.1%, while WPC offers 6.34% yield with a safety score of 84/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 76.0%. On a multiple basis, WPC commands a more attractive valuation at 12.0x P/AFFO vs 12.5x.

REITwave Snowflake™ Radar Battle: FCPT vs WPC

FCPT: 88/100 WPC: 82/100

Proprietary 5-pillar institutional overlay comparing Dividend Safety, Balance Sheet, Portfolio Quality, Cash Flow, and Valuation.

DIVIDEND FCPT: 18.8 vs WPC: 18.4 BALANCE SHEET FCPT: 15.5 vs WPC: 10.5 PORTFOLIO FCPT: 19.5 vs WPC: 19.5 CASH FLOW FCPT: 15.5 vs WPC: 15.5 VALUE & NAV FCPT: 18.5 vs WPC: 18.5
FCPT Technical Chart (Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.) $22.15
WPC Technical Chart (W. P. Carey Inc.) $63.90

12-Metric Institutional Side-by-Side Matrix

Core financial, valuation, dividend safety, balance sheet, and physical asset metrics.

Institutional Metric FCPT (Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.) WPC (W. P. Carey Inc.) Category Advantage
REITwave Composite Score™ 88 / 100 (FORTRESS) Higher Quality 82 / 100 (CORE ELITE) FCPT (+6 pts)
Dividend Yield 6.00% 6.34% Higher Yield WPC (+0.34% Spread)
Dividend Safety Score 88 / 100 Safer 84 / 100 FCPT
AFFO Payout Ratio 75.1% Safer Cushion 76.0% FCPT (0.9% Lower)
Price / AFFO Multiple 12.5x 12.0x Cheaper WPC
Price / FFO Multiple 11.6x 11.1x Cheaper WPC
NAV Premium / Discount -8.2% -8.3% Better Value WPC
Net Debt-to-EBITDA (Leverage) 4.8x Lower Debt 5.6x FCPT (Clean Balance Sheet)
Credit Rating (S&P / Moody's) BBB BBB Investment Grade
Physical Occupancy 99.2% Higher 98.0% FCPT
Commercial Real Estate Assets 150 Properties 150 Properties WPC (Larger Portfolio Scale)
Implied Market Cap Rate 6.54% 6.54% Spread vs 10-Yr Treasury
Payout Cadence & 52-Week Range Quarterly ($20.86 - $26.86) Quarterly ($62.24 - $77.22) Quarterly Distribution
Chapter 1

The Dividend Engine, Payout Safety & Cash Coverage

When analyzing dividend-generating Real Estate Investment Trusts, yield alone can be misleading without evaluating the underlying AFFO Payout Coverage Ratio and long-term cash flow durability. In this matchup, WPC leads with an annualized cash yield of 6.34%, delivering a +0.34% yield premium over FCPT's 6.00%.

However, dividend safety and dividend durability heavily favor the REIT with the stronger cash retention cushion. FCPT distributes 75.1% of its Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO), compared to 76.0% for WPC. A payout ratio below 80% provides vital protection against localized occupancy declines, enabling management to preserve distributions and self-fund redevelopment without accessing volatile capital markets.

Both companies operate on a quarterly distribution schedule, creating steady passive income streams for retirement accounts and income-oriented portfolios seeking Sleep-Well-At-Night (SWAN) stability.

Chapter 2

Valuation Multiples, P/AFFO Compression & NAV Arbitrage

Real estate equity valuations are best captured through the P/AFFO (Price-to-AFFO) multiple and the implied discount to private-market Net Asset Value (NAV). WPC commands a more attractive multiple at 12.0x P/AFFO, trading at a measurable discount to FCPT's 12.5x multiple.

Examining intrinsic property values, FCPT trades at a -8.2% spread to NAV, while WPC trades at -8.3% to NAV. When public REITs trade at a discount to Net Asset Value, investors effectively acquire institutional-grade commercial real estate assets at a price below replacement cost, providing built-in margin of safety and upside potential during sector valuation re-ratings.

Furthermore, the implied market cap rate sits at 6.54% for FCPT and 6.54% for WPC, offering healthy yield spreads over the benchmark 10-Year US Treasury yield.

Chapter 3

Balance Sheet Fortress, Leverage & Refinancing Wall Resilience

In a normalized higher-for-longer interest rate regime, balance sheet capitalization separates resilient REITs from vulnerable ones. FCPT holds the cleaner balance sheet with a Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 4.8x, substantially below commercial real estate danger thresholds, compared to 5.6x for WPC.

Credit rating agencies award FCPT an investment-grade rating of BBB, while WPC maintains a BBB credit rating. Superior credit tiers ensure lower credit spreads when issuing unsecured senior notes, insulating profitability against high-yield refinancing walls and borrowing cost spikes.

Combined with an occupancy rate of 99.2% for FCPT and 98.0% for WPC across a combined 300 commercial properties, tenant demand remains structurally resilient against economic headwinds.

Chapter 4

The 2026 Investor Verdict — Which REIT Belongs in Your Portfolio?

Determining whether to buy FCPT or WPC depends on your investment mandate and risk profile:

  • For Retirees & Current Yield Maximizers: WPC is the winner. Offering a 6.34% dividend yield, it optimizes immediate cash flow generation to support living expenses and distribution reinvestment.
  • For Conservative Wealth Preservation (SWAN) Investors: FCPT represents the premier holding. Its higher safety rating of 88/100, lower leverage ratio of 4.8x Net Debt/EBITDA, and disciplined AFFO payout provide robust capital protection.
  • Tax Optimization (Section 199A): Both FCPT and WPC dividends are eligible for the 20% Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction under Section 199A for US taxable accounts, significantly reducing the effective federal tax rate on income distributions.

Frequently Asked Questions: FCPT vs WPC

Key commercial real estate questions answered for institutional and retail investors.

Which REIT offers a higher dividend yield in 2026, FCPT or WPC? +
WPC delivers the higher current dividend yield of 6.34% compared to 6.00% for FCPT, representing an annualized cash yield spread of 0.34%.
Is FCPT or WPC safer based on balance sheet leverage and AFFO dividend coverage? +
Both REITs maintain safe balance sheets, but FCPT carries a superior dividend safety rating of 88/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 75.1%, backed by Net Debt-to-EBITDA leverage of 4.8x.
Which REIT is trading at a more attractive valuation multiple (P/AFFO and NAV)? +
WPC trades at a lower valuation multiple of 12.0x P/AFFO (vs 12.5x). On a private-market appraisal basis, WPC trades at a 8.3% discount to Net Asset Value (NAV).
How do interest rate fluctuations and Federal Reserve policy impact FCPT versus WPC? +
Higher interest rates elevate borrowing costs and increase cap rates across commercial real estate. FCPT holds an advantage with lower Net Debt-to-EBITDA of 4.8x, reducing debt refinancing risk on debt maturity walls.
What is the dividend payout schedule (monthly or quarterly) for FCPT and WPC? +
FCPT pays distributions on a quarterly schedule, while WPC distributes dividends on a quarterly schedule. Reinvesting compounding distributions enhances long-term total return.
Are distributions from FCPT and WPC eligible for the Section 199A 20% QBI tax deduction? +
Yes. Under US tax law, ordinary REIT dividends generally qualify for the Section 199A deduction, enabling eligible US taxable investors to deduct up to 20% of qualified REIT dividends from their taxable income.

Related Net Lease Restaurant Head-to-Head Battles

Explore quantitative comparisons across sector peers and benchmark REIT matchups.