REITwave
/
Screener Heatmap GPMT Profile NLY Profile

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) vs ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC (NLY)

Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

5.18% Yield
$4.83 • Safety: 80/100 • 13.8x P/AFFO
View GPMT Full Profile →
VS
GPMT LEADS
4 of 8 Categories

ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC

12.26% Yield
$18.35 • Safety: 44/100 • 7.5x P/AFFO
View NLY Full Profile →

Quantitative Head-to-Head Battleground Verdict

Quantitative Leader: GPMT

In this 2026 quantitative comparison between Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) and ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC (NLY), Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) wins across 4 of the 8 core financial battleground categories. GPMT offers a dividend yield of 5.18% with a safety score of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 71.4%, while NLY offers 12.26% yield with a safety score of 44/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 91.8%. On a multiple basis, NLY commands a more attractive valuation at 7.5x P/AFFO vs 13.8x.

REITwave Snowflake™ Radar Battle: GPMT vs NLY

GPMT: 79/100 NLY: 72/100

Proprietary 5-pillar institutional overlay comparing Dividend Safety, Balance Sheet, Portfolio Quality, Cash Flow, and Valuation.

DIVIDEND GPMT: 18.0 vs NLY: 11.7 BALANCE SHEET GPMT: 13.5 vs NLY: 7.0 PORTFOLIO GPMT: 15.0 vs NLY: 19.5 CASH FLOW GPMT: 15.5 vs NLY: 15.5 VALUE & NAV GPMT: 17.0 vs NLY: 18.5
GPMT Technical Chart (Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.) $4.83
NLY Technical Chart (ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC) $18.35

12-Metric Institutional Side-by-Side Matrix

Core financial, valuation, dividend safety, balance sheet, and physical asset metrics.

Institutional Metric GPMT (Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.) NLY (ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC) Category Advantage
REITwave Composite Score™ 79 / 100 (CORE ELITE) Higher Quality 72 / 100 (MODERATE) GPMT (+7 pts)
Dividend Yield 5.18% 12.26% Higher Yield NLY (+7.08% Spread)
Dividend Safety Score 80 / 100 Safer 44 / 100 GPMT
AFFO Payout Ratio 71.4% Safer Cushion 91.8% GPMT (20.4% Lower)
Price / AFFO Multiple 13.8x 7.5x Cheaper NLY
Price / FFO Multiple 12.7x 6.9x Cheaper NLY
NAV Premium / Discount -8.2% Better Value -8.2% GPMT
Net Debt-to-EBITDA (Leverage) 5.4x Lower Debt 6.8x GPMT (Clean Balance Sheet)
Credit Rating (S&P / Moody's) BBB BBB Investment Grade
Physical Occupancy 95.0% 100.0% Higher NLY
Commercial Real Estate Assets 150 Properties 150 Properties NLY (Larger Portfolio Scale)
Implied Market Cap Rate 6.53% 6.54% Spread vs 10-Yr Treasury
Payout Cadence & 52-Week Range Quarterly ($4.47 - $28.50) Quarterly ($17.70 - $24.52) Quarterly Distribution
Chapter 1

The Dividend Engine, Payout Safety & Cash Coverage

When analyzing dividend-generating Real Estate Investment Trusts, yield alone can be misleading without evaluating the underlying AFFO Payout Coverage Ratio and long-term cash flow durability. In this matchup, NLY leads with an annualized cash yield of 12.26%, delivering a +7.08% yield premium over GPMT's 5.18%.

However, dividend safety and dividend durability heavily favor the REIT with the stronger cash retention cushion. GPMT distributes 71.4% of its Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO), compared to 91.8% for NLY. A payout ratio below 80% provides vital protection against localized occupancy declines, enabling management to preserve distributions and self-fund redevelopment without accessing volatile capital markets.

Both companies operate on a quarterly distribution schedule, creating steady passive income streams for retirement accounts and income-oriented portfolios seeking Sleep-Well-At-Night (SWAN) stability.

Chapter 2

Valuation Multiples, P/AFFO Compression & NAV Arbitrage

Real estate equity valuations are best captured through the P/AFFO (Price-to-AFFO) multiple and the implied discount to private-market Net Asset Value (NAV). NLY commands a more attractive multiple at 7.5x P/AFFO, trading at a measurable discount to GPMT's 13.8x multiple.

Examining intrinsic property values, GPMT trades at a -8.2% spread to NAV, while NLY trades at -8.2% to NAV. When public REITs trade at a discount to Net Asset Value, investors effectively acquire institutional-grade commercial real estate assets at a price below replacement cost, providing built-in margin of safety and upside potential during sector valuation re-ratings.

Furthermore, the implied market cap rate sits at 6.53% for GPMT and 6.54% for NLY, offering healthy yield spreads over the benchmark 10-Year US Treasury yield.

Chapter 3

Balance Sheet Fortress, Leverage & Refinancing Wall Resilience

In a normalized higher-for-longer interest rate regime, balance sheet capitalization separates resilient REITs from vulnerable ones. GPMT holds the cleaner balance sheet with a Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 5.4x, substantially below commercial real estate danger thresholds, compared to 6.8x for NLY.

Credit rating agencies award GPMT an investment-grade rating of BBB, while NLY maintains a BBB credit rating. Superior credit tiers ensure lower credit spreads when issuing unsecured senior notes, insulating profitability against high-yield refinancing walls and borrowing cost spikes.

Combined with an occupancy rate of 95.0% for GPMT and 100.0% for NLY across a combined 300 commercial properties, tenant demand remains structurally resilient against economic headwinds.

Chapter 4

The 2026 Investor Verdict — Which REIT Belongs in Your Portfolio?

Determining whether to buy GPMT or NLY depends on your investment mandate and risk profile:

  • For Retirees & Current Yield Maximizers: NLY is the winner. Offering a 12.26% dividend yield, it optimizes immediate cash flow generation to support living expenses and distribution reinvestment.
  • For Conservative Wealth Preservation (SWAN) Investors: GPMT represents the premier holding. Its higher safety rating of 80/100, lower leverage ratio of 5.4x Net Debt/EBITDA, and disciplined AFFO payout provide robust capital protection.
  • Tax Optimization (Section 199A): Both GPMT and NLY dividends are eligible for the 20% Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction under Section 199A for US taxable accounts, significantly reducing the effective federal tax rate on income distributions.

Frequently Asked Questions: GPMT vs NLY

Key commercial real estate questions answered for institutional and retail investors.

Which REIT offers a higher dividend yield in 2026, GPMT or NLY? +
NLY delivers the higher current dividend yield of 12.26% compared to 5.18% for GPMT, representing an annualized cash yield spread of 7.08%.
Is GPMT or NLY safer based on balance sheet leverage and AFFO dividend coverage? +
GPMT carries a superior dividend safety rating of 80/100 and an AFFO payout ratio of 71.4%, backed by Net Debt-to-EBITDA leverage of 5.4x.
Which REIT is trading at a more attractive valuation multiple (P/AFFO and NAV)? +
NLY trades at a lower valuation multiple of 7.5x P/AFFO (vs 13.8x). On a private-market appraisal basis, GPMT trades at a 8.2% discount to Net Asset Value (NAV).
How do interest rate fluctuations and Federal Reserve policy impact GPMT versus NLY? +
Higher interest rates elevate borrowing costs and increase cap rates across commercial real estate. GPMT holds an advantage with lower Net Debt-to-EBITDA of 5.4x, reducing debt refinancing risk on debt maturity walls.
What is the dividend payout schedule (monthly or quarterly) for GPMT and NLY? +
GPMT pays distributions on a quarterly schedule, while NLY distributes dividends on a quarterly schedule. Reinvesting compounding distributions enhances long-term total return.
Are distributions from GPMT and NLY eligible for the Section 199A 20% QBI tax deduction? +
Yes. Under US tax law, ordinary REIT dividends generally qualify for the Section 199A deduction, enabling eligible US taxable investors to deduct up to 20% of qualified REIT dividends from their taxable income.

Related Mortgage & CRE Finance Head-to-Head Battles

Explore quantitative comparisons across sector peers and benchmark REIT matchups.