MORT vs RWR: Real Estate ETF Showdown

Institutional side-by-side analysis of fees, dividend cash flows, and underlying holdings overlap.

MORT
VanEck Mortgage REIT Income ETF (VanEck)
View Full ETF Profile →
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (State Street SPDR)
View Full ETF Profile →

Key Fundamental Specifications

Metric MORT RWR
Annual Expense Ratio 0.41% 0.25% Lowest Fee
Annual Dividend Yield 11.20% Higher Yield 3.75%
Assets Under Management (AUM) $0.3 Billion $1.2 Billion
Number of Holdings 28 Constituents 92 Constituents
Fund Issuer VanEck State Street SPDR
Benchmark Index MVIS US Mortgage REITs Index Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index

Top Holdings & Weight Overlap

Constituent weights across both funds:

REIT Constituent MORT Weight RWR Weight

Institutional Verdict: MORT or RWR?

Fee Advantage: RWR offers the lower expense ratio at 0.25% vs 0.41%. Over a 20-year holding period, lower expense drag preserves thousands of dollars in cumulative returns.

Yield Generation: For income-focused investors, MORT provides the higher current dividend yield at 11.20%, making it more attractive for living off dividend cash flow.

Conclusion: If your priority is low-cost passive index tracking, choose RWR. If your mandate is maximum immediate dividend yield, choose MORT.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between MORT and RWR?

VanEck Mortgage REIT Income ETF (MORT) is issued by VanEck with an expense ratio of 0.41% and dividend yield of 11.20%. In comparison, SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is issued by State Street SPDR charging 0.25% with a yield of 3.75%.

Which REIT ETF has lower fees: MORT or RWR?

RWR has the lower annual expense ratio (0.25% vs 0.41%), saving long-term investors money on compounding fee drag.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield: MORT or RWR?

MORT currently pays the higher annualized dividend yield (11.20% vs 3.75%).

Can I hold both MORT and RWR in a portfolio?

While you can hold both, MORT and RWR share significant constituent overlap in top REITs like Prologis, American Tower, and Equinix. Holding both may cause redundant portfolio exposure.