REET vs SRET: Real Estate ETF Showdown

Institutional side-by-side analysis of fees, dividend cash flows, and underlying holdings overlap.

REET
iShares Global REIT ETF (BlackRock)
View Full ETF Profile →
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (Global X)
View Full ETF Profile →

Key Fundamental Specifications

Metric REET SRET
Annual Expense Ratio 0.14% Lowest Fee 0.58%
Annual Dividend Yield 3.82% 8.45% Higher Yield
Assets Under Management (AUM) $3.1 Billion $0.2 Billion
Number of Holdings 358 Constituents 30 Constituents
Fund Issuer BlackRock Global X
Benchmark Index FTSE EPRA Nareit Global REITS Index Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index

Top Holdings & Weight Overlap

Constituent weights across both funds:

REIT Constituent REET Weight SRET Weight

Institutional Verdict: REET or SRET?

Fee Advantage: REET offers the lower expense ratio at 0.14% vs 0.58%. Over a 20-year holding period, lower expense drag preserves thousands of dollars in cumulative returns.

Yield Generation: For income-focused investors, SRET provides the higher current dividend yield at 8.45%, making it more attractive for living off dividend cash flow.

Conclusion: If your priority is low-cost passive index tracking, choose REET. If your mandate is maximum immediate dividend yield, choose SRET.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between REET and SRET?

iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is issued by BlackRock with an expense ratio of 0.14% and dividend yield of 3.82%. In comparison, Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is issued by Global X charging 0.58% with a yield of 8.45%.

Which REIT ETF has lower fees: REET or SRET?

REET has the lower annual expense ratio (0.14% vs 0.58%), saving long-term investors money on compounding fee drag.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield: REET or SRET?

SRET currently pays the higher annualized dividend yield (8.45% vs 3.82%).

Can I hold both REET and SRET in a portfolio?

While you can hold both, REET and SRET share significant constituent overlap in top REITs like Prologis, American Tower, and Equinix. Holding both may cause redundant portfolio exposure.