REET vs USRT: Real Estate ETF Showdown

Institutional side-by-side analysis of fees, dividend cash flows, and underlying holdings overlap.

REET
iShares Global REIT ETF (BlackRock)
View Full ETF Profile →
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (BlackRock)
View Full ETF Profile →

Key Fundamental Specifications

Metric REET USRT
Annual Expense Ratio 0.14% 0.08% Lowest Fee
Annual Dividend Yield 3.82% Higher Yield 3.48%
Assets Under Management (AUM) $3.1 Billion $2.6 Billion
Number of Holdings 358 Constituents 123 Constituents
Fund Issuer BlackRock BlackRock
Benchmark Index FTSE EPRA Nareit Global REITS Index FTSE Nareit Equity REITS Index

Top Holdings & Weight Overlap

Constituent weights across both funds:

REIT Constituent REET Weight USRT Weight

Institutional Verdict: REET or USRT?

Fee Advantage: USRT offers the lower expense ratio at 0.08% vs 0.14%. Over a 20-year holding period, lower expense drag preserves thousands of dollars in cumulative returns.

Yield Generation: For income-focused investors, REET provides the higher current dividend yield at 3.82%, making it more attractive for living off dividend cash flow.

Conclusion: If your priority is low-cost passive index tracking, choose USRT. If your mandate is maximum immediate dividend yield, choose REET.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between REET and USRT?

iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is issued by BlackRock with an expense ratio of 0.14% and dividend yield of 3.82%. In comparison, iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) is issued by BlackRock charging 0.08% with a yield of 3.48%.

Which REIT ETF has lower fees: REET or USRT?

USRT has the lower annual expense ratio (0.08% vs 0.14%), saving long-term investors money on compounding fee drag.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield: REET or USRT?

REET currently pays the higher annualized dividend yield (3.82% vs 3.48%).

Can I hold both REET and USRT in a portfolio?

While you can hold both, REET and USRT share significant constituent overlap in top REITs like Prologis, American Tower, and Equinix. Holding both may cause redundant portfolio exposure.