SRET vs USRT: Real Estate ETF Showdown

Institutional side-by-side analysis of fees, dividend cash flows, and underlying holdings overlap.

SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (Global X)
View Full ETF Profile →
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (BlackRock)
View Full ETF Profile →

Key Fundamental Specifications

Metric SRET USRT
Annual Expense Ratio 0.58% 0.08% Lowest Fee
Annual Dividend Yield 8.45% Higher Yield 3.48%
Assets Under Management (AUM) $0.2 Billion $2.6 Billion
Number of Holdings 30 Constituents 123 Constituents
Fund Issuer Global X BlackRock
Benchmark Index Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index FTSE Nareit Equity REITS Index

Top Holdings & Weight Overlap

Constituent weights across both funds:

REIT Constituent SRET Weight USRT Weight

Institutional Verdict: SRET or USRT?

Fee Advantage: USRT offers the lower expense ratio at 0.08% vs 0.58%. Over a 20-year holding period, lower expense drag preserves thousands of dollars in cumulative returns.

Yield Generation: For income-focused investors, SRET provides the higher current dividend yield at 8.45%, making it more attractive for living off dividend cash flow.

Conclusion: If your priority is low-cost passive index tracking, choose USRT. If your mandate is maximum immediate dividend yield, choose SRET.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between SRET and USRT?

Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is issued by Global X with an expense ratio of 0.58% and dividend yield of 8.45%. In comparison, iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) is issued by BlackRock charging 0.08% with a yield of 3.48%.

Which REIT ETF has lower fees: SRET or USRT?

USRT has the lower annual expense ratio (0.08% vs 0.58%), saving long-term investors money on compounding fee drag.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield: SRET or USRT?

SRET currently pays the higher annualized dividend yield (8.45% vs 3.48%).

Can I hold both SRET and USRT in a portfolio?

While you can hold both, SRET and USRT share significant constituent overlap in top REITs like Prologis, American Tower, and Equinix. Holding both may cause redundant portfolio exposure.