SRET vs VNQI: Real Estate ETF Showdown

Institutional side-by-side analysis of fees, dividend cash flows, and underlying holdings overlap.

SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (Global X)
View Full ETF Profile →
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (Vanguard)
View Full ETF Profile →

Key Fundamental Specifications

Metric SRET VNQI
Annual Expense Ratio 0.58% 0.12% Lowest Fee
Annual Dividend Yield 8.45% Higher Yield 4.60%
Assets Under Management (AUM) $0.2 Billion $3.6 Billion
Number of Holdings 30 Constituents 650 Constituents
Fund Issuer Global X Vanguard
Benchmark Index Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index

Top Holdings & Weight Overlap

Constituent weights across both funds:

REIT Constituent SRET Weight VNQI Weight

Institutional Verdict: SRET or VNQI?

Fee Advantage: VNQI offers the lower expense ratio at 0.12% vs 0.58%. Over a 20-year holding period, lower expense drag preserves thousands of dollars in cumulative returns.

Yield Generation: For income-focused investors, SRET provides the higher current dividend yield at 8.45%, making it more attractive for living off dividend cash flow.

Conclusion: If your priority is low-cost passive index tracking, choose VNQI. If your mandate is maximum immediate dividend yield, choose SRET.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between SRET and VNQI?

Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is issued by Global X with an expense ratio of 0.58% and dividend yield of 8.45%. In comparison, Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) is issued by Vanguard charging 0.12% with a yield of 4.60%.

Which REIT ETF has lower fees: SRET or VNQI?

VNQI has the lower annual expense ratio (0.12% vs 0.58%), saving long-term investors money on compounding fee drag.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield: SRET or VNQI?

SRET currently pays the higher annualized dividend yield (8.45% vs 4.60%).

Can I hold both SRET and VNQI in a portfolio?

While you can hold both, SRET and VNQI share significant constituent overlap in top REITs like Prologis, American Tower, and Equinix. Holding both may cause redundant portfolio exposure.